Posts Tagged ‘Dangerous State’

Regular car inspections and vehicle maintenance is mandatory so why is a home NOT subject to periodic safety, energy, thermal insulation and environmental standards regulation as well?

In an increasingly PC world why do we allow energy to be wasted and home owners to allow property to fall into a potentially dangerous state or one that is prejudicial to healthy living? Also remember that a vast number of UK homes remain empty for many years for no good reasons.

Should not society produce radical solutions likes home-owners having to state how many people have resided at their house (how many days per year, per person in relation to bedspaces available) and what energy costs were paid out for those people for that period. This would be one possible method whereby we begin to see which homes are falling behind – it would begin to tag “at risk” homes.

Recently Google completed the systematic recording of most streetscenes in England for its Google Streets initiative. Think of the cost of this! On the basis that homes at risk of falling into ruin are usually easily identifiable from the outside then it does not take a lot of imagination to realise that most sub-standard or at-risk homes could be identified by either simple human viewing of the front exterior (some flats being the only exception) and/or by means of mobile thermal imaging techniques.

If the above is correct then we can now easily identify most homes at risk and therefore target advice, help and perhaps grant finance. So why is help not always at hand to those who need it most? Why do so many buildings remain in poor order or even vacant for so many years?

Four reasons – finance, red tape, lack of education and lack of motivation:-

1. Society cannot motivate itself sufficiently to care enough.
2. The do-gooders produce solutions then fail to re-educate occupiers in ways to ensure good health and a good environment: often this is as simple as telling occupiers how to reside at any particular home in order to avoid condensation.
3. When we want to help often society often throws up NIMBY objections, Planning Rejections, Building Regulation disapprovals, etc… Red Tape bogs down initiative and solutions and therefore saps at our good intentions.
4. Money makes the world go round but when the needy require property help often the red-tape within the public systems employed to help those in need causes massive profit taking or sub-standard untimely solutions.

I do not wish or seek to belittle the massive help that many organisations can and do deliver to the least well off but what does bother me is that the resources and finance available to help those in need is so fragmented and disjointed that it comes a poor second to, say, the resources put into creating New Build projects for those who can afford a nice environment.

Are our resources and systems out of balance? Yes, I believe they are and that we need to re-consider how support mechanisms operate in future. A fundamental rethink is needed and this starts with early identification of poor housing so our housing stock is systematically improved (worst home owners having their properties taken away from them at discounted rates where no just cause of that property decline can be provided).

Some of you might say: nothing new in the above. I say yes, this is a radical solution because it seeks to identify problem cases before they reach that state whereby they are beyond economic repair and help whereby occupants are immediately displaced. The whole thrust of care becomes focused at the preventative stage before the state has to re-house the victims within our society.

Annual energy and occupancy housing returns linked to visual or thermal imaging generic surveys in identified worst cases. What do you think?

If you need advice, perhaps a review of your own portfolio of homes, or a consultation to take stock of where you are going with housing, why not call me for a chat? Stuart Parrett 01489 896 174 or use the CONTACT FORM at www.proinspect.co.uk.