Posts Tagged ‘Environmental Standards’

Regular car inspections and vehicle maintenance is mandatory so why is a home NOT subject to periodic safety, energy, thermal insulation and environmental standards regulation as well?

In an increasingly PC world why do we allow energy to be wasted and home owners to allow property to fall into a potentially dangerous state or one that is prejudicial to healthy living? Also remember that a vast number of UK homes remain empty for many years for no good reasons.

Should not society produce radical solutions likes home-owners having to state how many people have resided at their house (how many days per year, per person in relation to bedspaces available) and what energy costs were paid out for those people for that period. This would be one possible method whereby we begin to see which homes are falling behind – it would begin to tag “at risk” homes.

Recently Google completed the systematic recording of most streetscenes in England for its Google Streets initiative. Think of the cost of this! On the basis that homes at risk of falling into ruin are usually easily identifiable from the outside then it does not take a lot of imagination to realise that most sub-standard or at-risk homes could be identified by either simple human viewing of the front exterior (some flats being the only exception) and/or by means of mobile thermal imaging techniques.

If the above is correct then we can now easily identify most homes at risk and therefore target advice, help and perhaps grant finance. So why is help not always at hand to those who need it most? Why do so many buildings remain in poor order or even vacant for so many years?

Four reasons – finance, red tape, lack of education and lack of motivation:-

1. Society cannot motivate itself sufficiently to care enough.
2. The do-gooders produce solutions then fail to re-educate occupiers in ways to ensure good health and a good environment: often this is as simple as telling occupiers how to reside at any particular home in order to avoid condensation.
3. When we want to help often society often throws up NIMBY objections, Planning Rejections, Building Regulation disapprovals, etc… Red Tape bogs down initiative and solutions and therefore saps at our good intentions.
4. Money makes the world go round but when the needy require property help often the red-tape within the public systems employed to help those in need causes massive profit taking or sub-standard untimely solutions.

I do not wish or seek to belittle the massive help that many organisations can and do deliver to the least well off but what does bother me is that the resources and finance available to help those in need is so fragmented and disjointed that it comes a poor second to, say, the resources put into creating New Build projects for those who can afford a nice environment.

Are our resources and systems out of balance? Yes, I believe they are and that we need to re-consider how support mechanisms operate in future. A fundamental rethink is needed and this starts with early identification of poor housing so our housing stock is systematically improved (worst home owners having their properties taken away from them at discounted rates where no just cause of that property decline can be provided).

Some of you might say: nothing new in the above. I say yes, this is a radical solution because it seeks to identify problem cases before they reach that state whereby they are beyond economic repair and help whereby occupants are immediately displaced. The whole thrust of care becomes focused at the preventative stage before the state has to re-house the victims within our society.

Annual energy and occupancy housing returns linked to visual or thermal imaging generic surveys in identified worst cases. What do you think?

If you need advice, perhaps a review of your own portfolio of homes, or a consultation to take stock of where you are going with housing, why not call me for a chat? Stuart Parrett 01489 896 174 or use the CONTACT FORM at www.proinspect.co.uk.

ARCHIVE ARTICLE THAT INCLUDES THE ONLY SURVEYOR JOKE I COULD FIND ON THE INTERNET:

MAN : This house is a ruin. I wonder what stops it from falling down.

SURVEYOR: I think the woodworm are holding hands!

.

Who/What does the most damage to a home?

.

Woodworm: Rot: Leaks: Frost: UV radiation: Acid rain: DIY: Cowboy-Contractors: Ground movements: Occupier neglect, ignorance & lack of maintenance: Poor design: Inappropriate materials: Storms: Damp/Condensation ?

Woodworm: Multiple forms of woodworm exist – some are “notifiable hazards”. Not usually treated until well-established. Can be costly if ignored for many years or you have Death Watch Beetle.

Rot: Basically only two main forms – Wet & Dry. Wet rot – treat/repair what you see. Dry rot – add a “0 or two” to what you think it might cost!

Contractors: Some are brilliant, some are not! Always get a recommendation – find out what is excluded/included. Always find out when payments are required.

Health & Safety is vital but it can also cause increased costs. Ignore standards and codes and YOU will be in trouble. Even simple low-costs repairs sometimes need massive access costs. Lives are lost needlessly every year because we ignore H&S!

Architects choose materials and designs that Builders must be familiar with to construct your dream home. Any mismatch of skills and understanding and the Surveyor will detect them when they become a problem later on (or advise you that XX may become a problem due to YY).

Suns rays degrade certain materials. Over-heating (thermal gain) can cause dimensional instability and cracking and inappropriate environmental standards.

Frost causes many materials to degrade or to de-laminate. Water pipes/drains can freeze and split/leak. Choose the wrong materials and early failure can occur. (Other materials within land and buildings also cause problems in differing weather or land conditions).

.

The real answer to this riddle is “lack of, OR inappropriate monitoring and/or maintenance” causes the biggest problems. Any and every problem has a solution but the best answers always exist if problem diagnosis is both early and correct.

.

This throws the spotlight on the -

(1)  common sense of the home owner/occupier (often DIY or Bob-the-Builder solutions make matters worse).

(2)  whether adequate insurances exist (under-insurance means your claim or claims will not be met, or only in part).

(3)  the experience and range of diagnosis tools of the Architect and/or Surveyor.

(4)  the knowledge and experience of all contractors and professionals employed to rectify the problems.

Nothing is perfect, all things degrade but the right choice of maintenance methods, choice of alterations and improvements, the choice of materials used, etc…. are all central to the quality of what you achieve with a property.

• Do you cut corners to meet your restricted budget?
• Is the cheapest contractor the best contractor?
• What alternatives to your needs may exist?
• Which is the best choice – basic repairs or green improvements to cut fuel costs?
• Have you pursued those alternatives to see if grants are available?
• Have you taken cost-v-value advice?
• Is it worth doing analysis OR would it be better to move to a better home?

The property cycle =  BUY  -  MAINTAIN  -  ALTER OR IMPROVE -  MAINTAIN  – UPGRADE & RENEW ELEMENTS  -  MAINTAIN  – MAKE A PROFIT OR LEAVE AN INHERITANCE

Your actions and decisions throughout the above property cycle will determine the eventual outcome of your initial investment in buying a home. Recessions come and go but, over the longer term, housing remains a good investment if you treat it wisely.

If you make the right decisions during your ownership of any home you will have a smile on your face: if you opt for DIY or bodged-solutions to problems, or, even worse, ignore problems or complete no maintenance at all, you enter a potential spiral of decline that may see your investment become a millstone around your neck from which you never financially or environmentally recover.

.

Things to consider when investing in your next home.

• Can it be bought within budget?
• Have you the budget to maintain it?
• Have you commissioned and understood your own Surveyors Condition Report?
• Can and should you occasionally improve it to current green standards?
• Can you enlarge it if your space needs increase?
• Is there a price tone ceiling in your district (beyond this improvements may not add any value!)?
• Have you seen and understood the EPC on your potential new home?

• How exposed to frost and prevailing weather patterns is your potential next home?
• Is it within a known flood-plain?
• Does adequate, effective site/surface drainage exist?
• Has it been built upon, or next to, contaminated or filled ground?
• Can you obtain Buildings Insurance and at reasonable premiums without high excess payments?
• Is it traditionally or system built and is that method of construction mortgageable?

Do you need help in fully understanding the answers to the above information? CALL PROINSPECT.