<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title> &#187; Stagnation</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.proinspect.co.uk/tag/stagnation/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.proinspect.co.uk</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 24 Nov 2011 10:40:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Conservation Areas &#8220;at risk&#8221;?</title>
		<link>http://www.proinspect.co.uk/2010/02/conservation-areas/</link>
		<comments>http://www.proinspect.co.uk/2010/02/conservation-areas/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 13:42:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Stuart Parrett</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Must Read Issues]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bishops Waltham]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bricks And Mortar]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Brownfield Site]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Christmas Trees]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation Area]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation Areas]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Conservation Policy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[English Heritage]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gutter]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Hampshire Chronicle]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Listed Buildings]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Metal Brackets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nectar Card]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Page Headline]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sainburys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sainsbury]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sainsburys]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Satellite Dishes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Small Changes]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Stagnation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Thorny Issue]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.proinspect.co.uk/?p=420</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Special character of city “under threat” . English Heritage says two-thirds of Conservation Areas at risk of neglect. . This was reported – the main, front page headline &#8211; in the Winchester based Hampshire Chronicle in mid-2009. Will the use of Article 4 Directives be extended so affected homeowners cannot even make small changes to [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><strong><em>Special character of city “under threat”</em></strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="color: #ff6600;"><span style="font-size: medium;"><strong><em>.<br />
</em></strong></span></span></p>
<p><span style="font-size: medium;"><em>English Heritage says two-thirds of <strong>Conservation Areas</strong> at risk of neglect.</em></span></p>
<p>.</p>
<p>This was reported – the main, front page headline &#8211; in the Winchester based Hampshire Chronicle in mid-2009.</p>
<p>Will the use of <strong><span style="text-decoration: underline;">Article 4 Directives</span></strong> be extended so affected homeowners cannot even make small changes to their homes? Will Listed Building Officers use this new background influence to retrospectively demand past “improvements/works” are rescinded, new windows removed and replaced with single-glazed casements, paint colours changed, gutter types be replaced, Satellite Dishes removed or relocated, etc…… The list is potentially endless.</p>
<p>This opens up the old argument of <em>just what is being protected</em>? Also… all potential owners of Listed Buildings, or non-listed homes but within a Conservation Area, should always have a survey completed as added protection against retrospective claims (it doesn’t hold water that you didn’t do it – you are still liable).</p>
<p>Conservation should not mean “no change whatsoever”: districts and individual homes evolve with time and circumstances and often conservation policy and actions can cause district stagnation and either enhancement or depreciation in worth/value. A balance must be struck between parties to retain our bricks-and-mortar heritage.</p>
<p>In my own Town of Bishops Waltham, one of the Conservation Areas said to be “at risk”, we have several examples of such conundrums:-</p>
<p>High street shops have erected metal brackets to hold seasonal Christmas trees along the high street. Building Control officers sought for their removal as unauthorized development, mainly upon Listed Buildings, in a conservation area. Fortunately, common sense, for once, has intervened.</p>
<p>The larger, and more thorny, issue in Town at the moment revolves around a brownfield site as a possible Sainsbury superstore. <strong>Say No To Sainburys</strong> is plastered around town and feelings are running high.</p>
<p>Sainsburys say that <em>nectar card</em> analysis reveals that a large Store in town is more than required by the spending power of town residents alone and that a local store would encourage us to stop travelling to Fareham or Hedge End where giant stores abound, and are often grid-locked.</p>
<p>Local shops say NO, the town and high street would become a ghost town and destroy the quite charm of our market town. This NO faction, as always, are very vocal and believe the majority are against Sainburys.</p>
<p>Looking at this issue holistically and dispassionately, can our high street support an ever growing population with diverse needs, is parking adequate, are cars congesting what should be a pleasant shopping experience, how can our commercial centre grow and meet are needs?</p>
<p>The same basic underlying factors are at play –</p>
<p>Is the status-quo set in concrete or can a market town grow sensibly to serve residents needs? Can large changes OR many small changes be made yet not spoil the essential character of our environment?</p>
<p>I recently toured Asturias through to Galicia in north-west Spain, an area of small farmsteads, rural in character and with breathtaking countryside and coastlines. Change is happening big-time : a coastal motorway is opening up the region and nearly all major Towns are having ring-roads built, cobbled-stoned high-streets created, etc…. Change is a part of life and they are embracing it (<em>probably with EC grant funding, but that is another story</em>).</p>
<p>People, buildings and environments must adapt to current needs and trends if a sustainable community is to be created, one in which our children may just decide to stay in, rather than make an early bee-line to the nearest City (civilization, as only our youth see it).</p>
<p>Whether it is to Sainburys objectors, local Conservation Officers or a Listed Building owner, I say the same thing; be tolerant and do not shut off change for the sake of it.</p>
<p>Metal brackets or a fully fledge, massive Sainburys stores are matters that require proper judgement plus an empathy with not only our own needs but also those of the whole community. What does common-sense say to you &#8211; no change or evolution in a controlled fashion?</p>
<p>Time will tell. To change or not to change?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.proinspect.co.uk/2010/02/conservation-areas/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

